Accessibility Audits
Evaluating products against WCAG 2.2 and BITV 2.0 standards, with findings documented for design and development handover — grounded in years of public-sector and enterprise accessibility work.
What an accessibility audit actually is
An accessibility audit is a structured review of a digital product against established accessibility standards — primarily WCAG 2.2 (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, the current international standard) and BITV 2.0 (Barrierefreie-Informationstechnik-Verordnung, the German regulation for public-sector digital products). It identifies barriers that prevent users with disabilities from using the product effectively.
The point is not just compliance. According to the WHO, 16 percent of people worldwide live with a disability, and another significant share faces situational limitations — a noisy environment, a mobile device in sunlight, a temporary injury. Accessibility work makes products usable for more people in more situations.
Accessibility audits are conducted for web applications, mobile apps, and enterprise software, with particular depth in public-sector and digital identity contexts where compliance is legally required.
Since 2025, accessibility is mandatory for companies too
For a long time, accessibility in Germany was mostly a public-sector topic. That changed on 28 June 2025, when the Barrierefreiheitsstärkungsgesetz (BFSG), Germany’s implementation of the European Accessibility Act, came into force. It requires private companies to make certain digital products and services accessible as well.
In scope are, among others, online shops and other e-commerce services, online banking, telecommunication services, e-books, and websites and apps for ticketing and passenger transport. Micro-enterprises with fewer than ten employees and an annual turnover of no more than two million euros are exempt, but only for services. Technically, the BFSG leads via the EN 301 549 standard to WCAG, which means the same criteria I audit against.
Many teams have never been under accessibility pressure before and do not know where their product stands. In that situation an audit is usually the most useful first step, because it shows which barriers need to go first and what can be fixed with reasonable effort.
When an accessibility audit fits
- A product needs to meet WCAG 2.2 or BITV 2.0 compliance before launch, contract, or release
- An online shop, banking app, or other consumer-facing service falls under the BFSG
- A redesign is being planned and current accessibility status needs to be documented
- A client or buyer (often in enterprise or public-sector procurement) requires accessibility certification
- A team wants to understand where their product fails users with disabilities and how to fix it
- A pre-launch check is needed before formal conformance testing by a certified body
- An existing product is being scaled to new markets with stricter accessibility requirements (EU, public-sector, regulated industries)
What you get
- Executive summary with severity overview and top priorities
- Detailed findings organized by WCAG success criterion or BITV requirement
- Screenshots with annotations marking specific barriers
- Severity classification (A, AA, AAA for WCAG; corresponding levels for BITV)
- Recommended fixes with notes on implementation
- Compliance status overview (compliant, partially compliant, not compliant) per criterion
- Optional: walkthrough meeting with the design and development team
How the process runs
A typical accessibility audit runs across two weeks:
- Scoping conversation (one to two hours): clarifying the product, the standards to apply (WCAG 2.2 AA is the default and covers the legally required 2.1; BITV 2.0 for the public sector), and the scope of the audit.
- Automated checks (one day): using accessibility testing tools (axe, WAVE, Lighthouse) to surface the issues that can be detected automatically.
- Manual review (three to five days): the bulk of the work — evaluating against WCAG criteria that cannot be tested automatically. This is where experience matters.
- Assistive technology testing (one to two days): testing with screen readers (NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver), keyboard navigation, and other assistive tools.
- Synthesis and prioritization (two to three days): findings written up, prioritized, formatted for handover.
For larger products, three to four weeks is realistic. For focused audits on specific flows, one week may be sufficient.